GMO’s and Pesticide Resistance

Several months ago, I posted and tweeted some information regarding GMO’s, glyphosate, and the current state of agriculture. Since then there has been a major jury verdict awarding a cancer patient $289 million from Monsanto. Of course there are many news agencies, corporate ad agencies, and campaigns disparaging this verdict. It is being called pseudoscience, fake science, etc. and many conventional ag groups are saying this is the destruction of “sustainable” agriculture.

Nothing is said, of course, that the judge in this case ruled in favor of Monsanto in every manner he could, disallowing nearly 90% of scientific literature that would have yet furthered the case of the plaintiff. Stay tuned – there are several thousand similar cases either already filed or soon to be filed and this full slate of scientific data will come out.
We spend more money in the U.S. on healthcare than any other country in the world, yet we have the sickest society of all the developed countries. Most significantly, we have increasing rates of acute and chronic disease, including cancer and birth defects in children. This is directly attributed to environmental causes. We see similar problems in agriculture regarding bacterial, fungal, and viral diseases – either new or resurfacing diseases previously eradicated or well controlled.
For example, many areas in the sugar beet growing regions using RR sugar beets and glyphosate are having significant problems with crown rot from rhizoctonia and fusarium fungi, both of which are significantly enhanced by the application of glyphosate. At the same time, there is a trend showing up of complete resistance to fungicides. This resistance problem has led to significantly increased applications of fungicides, know toxicants to humans.
 

Cercospora leaf spot is a menace and resistant to most herbicides. Many farmers watch their sugar beets degrade in post-harvest stacks and never make it to market.  Most of the areas now have significant to complete glyphosate weed resistance. Those that think they don’t are just in the “honeymoon” phase and will soon experience the same resistance to glyphosate as everywhere else in the world.

In corn, we are seeing infestation by Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis in every region of the U.S., causing Goss’s Wilt. For 30 years it was a non-issue, isolated to just 7 counties in Nebraska and Iowa under only certain conditions. For the past 10 years, however,  it has spread to all corn growing areas regardless of weather and climatic conditions, spread both by the wind and genetically engineered b seed. 

It is such a problem in Colorado sweet corn production that some farmers have to overseed by 50% to make up for the poor seedling survival and still only harvest about 1/3 of their ears due to inconsistent ripening. Goss’s Wilt is the consequence of two factors: First, genetically engineered varieties are immunologically weaker than their non-GMO counterparts and, thus, the Goss’s Wilt susceptibility has returned. This is including the seeds, as about 90 percent of corn grown in the U.S. is genetically engineered. 

The second factor is that increased Clavibacter virulence (as well as the increase virulence of other bacterial, viral, and fungal disease organisms) is a consequence of glyphosate’s disrupting the soil and plant biology.  Glyphosate is an antibiotic. Monsanto has a patent for it: August 10, 2010, US7771736. as an antibiotic.  Glyphosate kills beneficial/protective bacteria in the soil.  We see this consequence in every crop grown today with greater and greater regularity the more and longer glyphosate is used. Whether Panama disease in bananas, greening disease in citrus, Goss’s Wilt in corn, or crown rot in sugar beets, these are all precipitating consequence of glyphosate’s antibacterial and nutrient chelating properties.

A recent article: Published: 05 February 2018 A good life for all within planetary boundaries (by Daniel W. O’Neill, Andrew L. Fanning, William F. Lamb & Julia K. Steinberger in Nature Sustainability volume 1, pages 88–95 (2018) ) suggests that we cannot continue the current state of societal operation, both socially and biophysically. Along this thought there are many articles insisting that the only way we can survive is to genetically engineer all our crops and spray more glyphosate on everything. 

In a similar vein, one recent article proposed that organic dairy operations in Europe are more environmentally destructive than the conventional dairy operations. Unfortunately, there is probably some validity to that last contention as well as the previous contentions if one is only considering what is publicized regularly.  The real truth is that neither systems are sustainable, environmentally safe, nor sufficient in feeding the expanding world population. 

There is a third consideration, a system of farming that is based upon solid nutritional science and biology.  It is one that acknowledges that every concern from disease pest to insects pests to weed infestations to drought resistance, climate tolerance, taste, yield, aesthetics, storability, and profitability are directly correlated to nutrition.  Disease organisms are not a genetic engineering nor a chemical weapon deficiency nor are any of the other traits mentioned.  Appropriate nutrition regenerates the soil/environment. It solves, not delays, all the above mentioned problems from Goss’s Wilt to blight and so on. It’s downfall is that is does not sell chemical weapons (pesticides) nor is it patentable. Consequently, it does not garner a lot of hype, research grants, nor lobbyist money. It just solves our food production problems.

My Commentary on the article “Europe’s Decision to Reject Gene Edited Crops Signals It Is Losing It’s Commitment to Sustainable Agriculture.”

There was an article recently in the Genetic Literacy Project “newsletter” titled “Europe’s Decision to Reject Gene Edited Crops Signals It Is Losing It’s Commitment to Sustainable Agriculture” by Jens Sundstrom and Torbjorn Fagerstrom, August 20, 2018. 
The Genetic Literacy Project is an industry front site to promote GMO’s. In all honesty, they do sprinkle a few legitimate interesting articles into the mix,  just to keep the appearance of “professional reporting.” They profess to be “scientific,” and paint anyone who challenges the biotech/chemical weapons agricultural industry as “fringe,” quackish, and certainly, unscientific.  
Unfortunately, there are some anti-GMO people who do represent The Genetic Literacy Project’s claims. They may even get a lot of press time, but they do not reflect the majority of the scientists such as Don Huber, Michael McNeill, Robert Kremer, Gilles-Eric Seralini, etc. – career researchers with the highest of integrity and scientific acumen. These particular anti-GMO people also don’t represent the thousands of farmers around the world who have transitioned from the GMO model to the organic/biological/sustainable model when they realized the GMO model was not at all sustainable.
Too bad the good Professor Sundstrom is misinformed and unaware that science based organics/biological/sustainable farming out produces the conventional/GMO approach, actually reverses environmental destruction, increases nutrient density of the food, and does all this more profitably for the farmer, while sequestering carbon. The Europeans are big on carbon sequestration. 
The only way we will feed the ever expanding world population is with science based organic or biological/sustainable production. The mantra for the GMO industry is that we must have biotechnology to feed the world, yet their yields, food nutrient density, shelf-life, soil regeneration, and farm profit are all lower than the scientific model to which I refer. The GMO industry fails to understand basic bioscience in the field. Every time a nutrient is applied it must be accompanied by a carbon, e.g. nitrogen with humic acid or molasses.  I suggest Professor Sundstrom educate himself about Francis Chaboussou, Philip Callahan, and Don Huber.
The standard medical model seeks to convince the public that all their ills are genetic in origin when, in truth, only 5% of human ills are genetic in origin. Similarly, the mantra of the biotech industry is all about genetics. The truth truth is, we can’t genetically engineer a better world.
In both plants and animals, environment determines genetic expression and 95% of all plant and animal ills are environmentally determined via nutrition – the fertilizer program and diet, respectively. 
I suggest the professor become informed about the use of a refractometer and get out into the fields, greenhouses, and grocery stores checking the brix readings of fruits and vegetables as well as animal feeds. The higher the brix (due entirely to better plant nutrition) the higher the nutrient density, the longer the shelf life, the better the taste and palatability, and the better the yield potential. 
I suggest the professor look into NovaCropControl from the Netherlands. They have confirmed Callahan’s and Chaboussou’s writings, with a proprietary plant testing technology showing insect and disease infestation of ALL crops is absolutely correlated to the nutrient density and ratio of that crop. 
It’s not the genes that need altering, it’s the nutritional management. But of course, you can’t patent nutrition, earn royalties from it, or garner huge research grants from the chemical and biotech industry for nutritional research.  No, with nutrition we just solve the problems of food production, feeding the world, and regenerating the earth.  This is the real 21st century technology, Professor Sundstrom. This is the true sustainable model.  In truth, Europe is rejecting the false model of sustainability you are promoting.

Q5: Local doctor running for governor of Kansas

Arden Andersen is a doctor, member of the U.S. Air Force Reserves and former teacher and in this Q5, he talks about joining the Democratic gubernatorial primary race.

Arden Andersen is a doctor, member of the U.S. Air Force Reserves and former teacher and in this Q5, he talks about joining the Democratic gubernatorial primary race.

Arden, why are you running for governor?
I am running for governor because I, like most Kansans and tax- payers in every state, am tired of the politics- -as-usual promises of career politicians. I am tired of partisan bickering and deadlock. I am tired of incompetent politicians making ridiculous, inoperable legislation for political favoritism and special-interest profits.
I am tired of reelection sound bites that never actually solve our healthcare, education, public health and safety, infrastructure, human rights, and environmental problems. I am running because as a family physician, public health professional, farmer and farm consultant, teacher, and colonel in the Air Force Reserves, I have the holistic perspective, training, and understanding how healthcare is connected to agriculture connected to public health and safety connected to infrastructure connected to education and human rights. The legislature governs/rules by committee and consensus.
The governor has to make executive decisions, has to have the knowledge of the holistic connection of all areas to make the best decision for all people. I make life-and-death decisions daily.
Many times leaders do not have the luxury of leading by committee, rather, they have to make an executive decision in a crisis.
If I am not able to make a good decision in an emergency crisis myself, I will not be able to make a better decision with all the information given to me by others. I am the candidate for governor that has that needed executive decision-making savvy to solve our healthcare, education, infrastructure, and human rights issues, just to name a few.

How has your wide range of experience in many different fields such as farming, teaching, coaching, military and medicine given you knowledge that will address the challenges that Kansas faces?
Just as I’ve said for answer 1, plus I am the only candidate that truly has training and experiential holistic perspective on problem solving.

Why is it important for Kansas to diversify agriculture and how would hemp and organic crops help the economy?
Diversification is the only mechanism we have for economic survival. The standard mantra of “international markets” as the savior to Kansas agriculture is really a race to the bottom as far as commodity prices and farm profitability. We (U.S.) are competing with South America, China, Mexico, highly subsidized EU, and highly sophisticated Australia for the commodity markets. Contrary to the “we feed the world” rhetoric, we produce 108 million metric tons of soybeans. South America produces 130.2 million metric tons. We rank No. 4 in the world for wheat production behind China, India, and Russia. We produce 55 million metric tons of wheat and the other 9 countries of the top-10 producers produce 452 million metric tons. There is roughly 470 million metric tons of milled rice produced in the world, the U.S. produces 6.4 million metric tons. We do produce about 33 percent of the world’s corn and about 20 percent of the world’s beef. Forty percent of the corn goes for ethanol and only 13 percent of corn is exported. We exported about 10.5 percent of our beef production in 2017. Kansas ag relies heavily on corn and beef. Consumer demand is the true driver of agriculture. We need more crops like hemp that also bring probable processing industries with them. We need more organic corn as we import 600,000 acres worth of organic corn from foreign countries at prices two to three times the price of conventional corn. Much of this corn goes for feeding organic beef, pork, chickens, and dairy — all of which also bring much higher pricing, making the Kansas farmer more profitable and sustainable. As governor, I bring the knowledge of how to make this happen on small and large farms.

Can you describe the GMO and cultured meat products on the horizon and how would they benefit the state economically and environmentally and prove to be a healthy alternative to standard meat products?
Another significant factor that will affect long- term sustainability of Kansas corn, soybeans, beef, pork, and chicken production is GMO meatless “meat” and cultured meats. Bill Gates, Charles Branson, Cargill, and Tyson are just a few big pockets to invest in both of these technologies. They are already developed past the restaurant testing stage with great acceptance, thus, the investments by deep pockets.
Consider these technologies on top of the growing non-dairy milks, cheeses, yogurts, and ice creams plus the animal free “meat” products already growing rapidly via Natural Grocers, Whole Foods, Sprouts, Hi-V, Price Chopper, and even Walmart.
Diversification and differentiation are mandatory for Kansas beef and corn farmers to survive. It is no longer a matter of “if” rather a matter of “when.”

What kind of family practice do you have in Leavenworth?
I have a private holistic practice consisting largely of Medicaid and lower socio-economic patients, along with offering DOT physicals, work-related injuries treatment, nutritional therapies, IV therapies, prolotherapy with PRP and amniotic allograft, bioidentical hormone replacement therapy, and osteopathic manual medicine. My patients range from newborns to elderly. I also consult on high-risk pregnancies for nutritional and hormone therapies.

What are your beliefs on the the link between soil/human health and climatic issues, public health issues, preventative medicine and the underlying solutions needed to return harmony and health to all living systems?
I have spent 30 years teaching the direct connection between nutrition and health at all levels from soil to plant to the dinner plate to the consumer and into the doctor’s office and hospital. Genetics play a roll often in susceptibility, but the fact of the matter is that environment determines genetic expression. Charles Northern, MD in 1936 read in the Congressional Record the dire problem of declining nutrient values in foods. Followup testing over the years by the USDA and others have shown steady and consistent decline in the nutrient values of most every food grown today by modern agriculture. It is why it is so important that we properly supply people with nutritional supplements to make up the deficiencies in the food.
Nutrition is the foundation to preventive medicine and the foundation to the reversal of illness. If/when we truly address the nutrition in the soil, not only do we get better production, better profitability, and better nutrient density in the food, we also get increased carbon sequestration – humus – deposition which increases soil water and nutrient holding capacity. This recedes erosion, reduces drought resistance, and improves soil tilth. Further, as nutrition improves we have fewer weed, disease, and insect pressures, so the farmer can automatically reduce pesticide use. That improved nutrient density in the crop translates to better health for every consumer, including animals if that crop is going for animal feed. Our environmental, animal, and human health issues are not too complex to fix, just challenging for many to get their heads around it. We must change the belief that nature is the enemy to conquer, but instead the teacher to heed and manage accordingly.

You have said that your patients have been your constant inspiration in running for governor. What do you think needs to be done to improve the healthcare system?
First, we deprivatize Medicaid and model the system more like the Australian system which spends less that half what Kansas spends per person and delivers better care than our current Medicaid system. Next, we need to develop the Direct Primary Care model for middle class families as a possible option for receiving their healthcare.
Then, we set in place a preventative medicine program for everyone, especially the lower socioeconomic population, and help people with diet, nutrition, shopping, cooking, and lifestyle improvement.
We overhaul our mental health system to ensure that everyone has mental health care available to them. This means we must fund it enough to bring more mental health professionals into the field and into Kansas.
What do the four books you have written address?
“Science In Agriculture” is a foundation teaching on biological soil and plant science; “The Anatomy of Life and Energy In Agriculture” is the primer/introduction on the correlations between nutrition and weeds, diseases, and insects ; “Real Medicine, Real Health” is an overview of my medical practice from 10 years ago which needs revising (planned for next year); “Food Plague,” now in its second edition, is an extensive overview of the problems with the quality and contamination of our food, including over 450 citations of scientific literature. I have written a few other items, but these are the major four.

If elected governor, what will be your top problems in the state that you will focus on and improve?
1. Overhaul the Kansas Medicaid system and expand it to an additional 380,000 people as soon as possible. 2. Mental health improvement to get mental health services better covered by Medicaid and for lower socioeconomic patients. 3. Education: initially hold three-four regional teacher forums to gather information of what teachers need to achieve in their mission of teaching children, and what they are tasked to teach. Take this information and formulate an education budget for the state. 4. Human rights resolutions: I will elevate the discussions on human rights to the medical and constitutional level, out of the typical social/religious divisive arena. We must move to resolve these issues in the legal area in order to fully protect everyone equally, fully honor everyone’s constitutional rights, and get on with solving the above issues we face in Kansas. 5. Infrastructure revitalization: revisit all engineering formulas/standards in the state for roads and bridges and move in a direction of improving them so we are not building roads that last for 10 years financed by 30-year bonds. 6. Prison reform and deprivatization of the prison system, revitalization of real inmate rehabilitation, not mixing minor criminals with violent criminals, and legalization of medical marijuana so we reduce the number of non-violent, minor prisoners.
— Rimsie McConiga

Immigration Issues

One very contentious issue in Kansas, and actually around the world, is immigration.  The more unstable our society becomes, the more those who are displaced, downtrodden, and persecuted flee to other countries.  The majority of people are simply seeking a better life for themselves and their families.  Yes, there are some people with criminal intent, and we must filter them out of the mix. Human nature has not changed much in 10,000 years, there will always be some devious folks. To suggest, however, that the majority of immigrants have criminal intent is false.

I, like most Kansans, have relied upon the news media for most of my information regarding the immigration issues.  However, having traveled around the world several times, I have found reality, more often than not, to be quite different than what the news media portrays.

Politicians on both sides of the isle taint the facts to push their particular agenda.  I decided I needed to get more facts about immigration and found a brilliant immigration attorney on Minnesota Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas by the name of Denise LaBaron-Ramos. What she taught me and discussed with me really opened my eyes on the issue.

In 1986, the U.S. gave amnesty to illegal immigrants, most of which were linked to agricultural labor.  It was not citizenship, just legal status – much like the “purple card” system I support. People had to prove they were safe without any criminal background.  This included their immediate family only, no parents, grandparents, cousins, etc.

It is amazing how the media, political groups, and talk show hosts will content that there are thousands of illegal immigrants with false social security numbers collecting welfare.  Not likely. When a person applies, their SSN must clear and correlate with their identity.

Only citizens can vote.  Having legal status does not allow one to vote.  As we have seen of recent with the Kansas Secretary of State, the contentions for widespread voter fraud are just not verifiable. One or two individuals does not a trend make.  If there is truly all this fraud, then the current long standing republican majority in Kansas must be falsely achieved.

DACA was an executive order issued by President Obama because Speaker Boehner refused to bring the issue to the floor.  People have to renew every 2 years, be fingerprinted, and prove a completely clear record, e.g. cannot have a traffic ticket, a DUI, nor even a complaint of domestic abuse; no issue against moral turpitude – there doesn’t even have to be a conviction. They must be squeaky clean or will be deported.  Also, DACA applications don’t begin until the person is 15.

Immigration court is separate from regular courts and is funded by immigration fees exclusively, not federal dollars.  If a person wants to become a citizen legally, it takes 8.5-9 years AT THE MINIMUM plus the person must pass a civics test (most natural born Americans can’t pass the test).  It will cost around $15,000 with a $500 initial application fee.

If a citizen has other family members that want to become citizens, an application must be filed, which, if all goes well, could take between 12 and 20 years for that family member to be accepted to become a citizen.

“Anchor baby” is the term given to a baby born in the U.S. to  a non-citizen. The baby is a U.S. citizen if the parents properly register the child.  In order for the parents to eventually become citizens, they cannot stay in the U.S. more than 120 days and must never, ever reside in the U.S. illegally.  If the parents ever apply to become citizens and they were here illegally, they must apply for a waiver along with the citizenship application. But the waiver is never granted, so they will never actually get citizenship.  So the contention that all these people are getting legal status and citizenship linked to “anchor babies” is simply false.

Thank you to Attorney Denise LaBaron-Ramos of KCK, an immigration attorney par excellence for her tutoring me on this subject.

Andersen2018.com

Business, Capitalism, and People.

There is a movement afoot to disparage anyone that wishes to promote environmental safety, public health, and conservation of natural resources.  It is a group that contends that one of such fairy tale belief is anti-capitalism and anti-business. What is first and foremost forgotten in this argument is that there is no capitalism and no business without people.  People are the living, breathing inventors of business, the operators and, ultimately, the consumers of the products produced.  There are all types of capitalism, of businesses.  To suggest that unfettered capitalism is good for the economy and, subsequently, good for people, is simply false.  Prostitution, as well as the illicit cocaine and methamphetamine business, are certainly capitalistic. Gun running weapons to supply terrorist organizations is also pure capitalism – and a very profitable business. Fleecing the elderly of their savings is capitalistic. Smuggling illegal immigrants into foreign countries and buying and selling workers for sex trade, sweat shops, and mine work is very profitable and capitalistic.  The problem is that all these listed capitalistic endeavors do not consider the negative consequences to people on the trade end of the businesses. There is no conscious consideration for the human collateral damage, only the benefit of great profits.

When otherwise legal companies conduct business in such a way that great human collateral damage occurs, legal or not, the unfettered capitalism must be reined in and made to clean up its act.  We have such unfettered capitalism in some of our industries.  The chemical industries have for decades polluted the environment and the food chain, causing a multitude of adverse health effects on people, animals, and natural resources.  They are profitable on the surface, but if they were made to pay for the collateral damage they have directly and indirectly caused, their seemingly lush profits quickly fade into debt.

Capitalism is a great opportunity to take human creativity and ingenuity, along with some fundamental work ethic, and create a better life for all, provided that the human component, both as capitalist and consumer, is first and foremost the center of consideration for all decisions made by the capitalist.

Andersen2018.com

Working to Heal Kansas

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑